Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Netherlands Pipeline Construction Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 3, 1968No. 42684, 42690PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
There is presented here for review a corrected order on appeal entered by the State Industrial Court sitting en banc. Separate appeals are prosecuted to this court by petitioner, LeRoy O. Armstrong (appeal No. 42,684), the injured party, claimant below, and the Veterans Administration (appeal No. 42,690), claimant below, the governmental agency furnishing a portion of the medical care and treatment of claimant, Armstrong. There is no conflict of interests between the two petitioners. The - two appeals are consolidated here for review and disposition. They will be hereinafter…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. HesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Smith v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Kiespert v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- McMinn v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Nelson v. Central State Roofing CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Snyder v. Smith Welding & FabricationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Mullins v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- PFL Life Insurance Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Alexander v. City of BristowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.