Legal Opinion

State v. Kozlosky

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 22, 2011No. 95861PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Patricia Ann Blackmon, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Carl Kozlosky, appeals his convictions and assigns ten errors for our review. 1 Having reviewed the record and pertinent law, we reverse the convictions and remand for a new trial. The apposite facts follow.

{¶ 2} Carl Kozlosky admitted shooting Andre Coleman in self-defense. The first trial was scheduled in March 2010. At the close of the state’s questioning of its primary witness, Valerie McNaughton, the prosecutor asked her, “[D]id Carl ever express a willingness or desire to kill Andre prior to killing him?” Immediately, the defense…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. MelchiorOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. WardOhio Court of Appeals · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. State v. BundyOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. WorleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. ClayOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. State v. KeanOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API