Kaiser v. Fadem
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
At all times material to this controversy defendants in error were engaged, with headquarters at Tulsa, Oklahoma, in buying and selling oil field equipment, dismantling oil leases and selling property used in the oil business. As plaintiffs, they obtained a verdict and judgment against plaintiff in error, another Tulsa dealer, as defendant, for $5,000 as their broker’s commission on the sale of a gasoline plant at Depew, Oklahoma, which said defendant and his associates purchased from one, M. F. Powers. From said judgment, said defendant has perfected the present appeal.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. WithersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Adams v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Old American Life Ins. Co. v. BiggersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Tulsa Fruit Co. v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Kennedy, Ex'rs v. Marshall, Ex'xSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
3Cited by6 opinions
- Arthur L. Black v. Baker Oil Tools, Inc., a Division of Baker Hughes, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Parkhill Truck Company v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- M. P. Appleby, Jr. v. Kewanee Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Worner Agency, Inc. v. DoyleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Equity Benefit Life Insurance Co. v. TrentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.