Legal Opinion

Natural Grocers v. Perdue

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 13, 2022No. 3:20-cv-05151Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 NATURAL GROCERS, et al., Case No. 20-cv-05151-JD 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. 9 10 THOMAS VILSACK, et al., Defendants. 11 12 13 In 2016, Congress amended the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to enact the first 14 national mandatory bioengineered food disclosure standards. See

7 U.S.C. § 1639

(the disclosure 15 statute). The purpose of the disclosure statute is to establish uniformity in the way that 16 bioengineered food is labeled and described to consumers. Plaintiffs are retail stores that sell 17…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API