Legal Opinion

Lesnik v. Public Industrials Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 30, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

The defendant, Public Industrials Corporation, has moved for leave to join C. Herbert Davison, Guy George Gabrielson and Albert L. Wolfe as third-party defendants to the defendant’s counterclaim in this action, and for leave to serve them with copies of its answer and counterclaim.

The plaintiff’s claim for relief, as stated in his complaint, is based on a $10,000 face value note, originally made by the defendant to the Bank of New York and Trust Company on January 15, 1938, and assigned to Harry Lesnik, plaintiff herein, on February 2, 1942 by the Bank of New York…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Original Ballet Russe, Ltd. v. Ballet Theatre, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  2. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Corp. v. New England Terminal Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lesnik v. Public Industrials CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. Union Paving Company v. Downer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  3. Value Line Fund, Inc. v. MarcusDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  4. Rutherford v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1945
  5. City of Westminster v. Phillips-Carter-Osborn, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API