Legal Opinion

State v. Gill

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1901No. 12,383PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Allen district court; L. Stillwell, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

*383,r . Reid sufficient. *382John Gill was prosecuted for violations of the prohibitory liquor law upon an informa*383tion containing ten counts, and was found guilty of the charges stated in three of the counts. He appealed, and contends, first, that the information should have been quashed because the verification was indefinite. It was verified positively by Adell B. Beaumont, and it was also verified upon information and belief by G. R. Gard, as county attorney. In the transcript the printed words “county attorney” followed the signature of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. State v. LundSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  3. City of Holton v. BimrodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. State v. HathawaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API