Legal Opinion

City of Holton v. Bimrod

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 7, 1899No. Nos. 11,429, 11,431PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeals from court of appeals, northern department ; John H. Mahan, Abijah Wells, and Sam’l W. McElroy, judges.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

Jurisdiction of this court is invoked by the appellants for the reason that they were arrested, tried and convicted in violation of section 15 of the bill of rights, which provides : “ . . . and no warrant shall issue but on probable cause sup*14ported by oath or affirmation,” etc. The prosecutions were had under a city ordinance prescribing penalties for the keeping and sale of intoxicating liquors except for medical, scientific and mechanical purposes. The original complaints, upon which warrants were issued by the police judge for appellants’ arrest, were sworn to positively and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MoseliSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  2. Erb v. MoraschSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Turley v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Wilbanks v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  4. State v. AddingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  5. State v. GreeneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API