Legal Opinion

Olin v. Town of North Hempstead

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs, in the following memorandum: We reach the same conclusion as Special Term but on nonconstitutional grounds. The record leaves no doubt that the Town Board from the beginning intended and planned that the incinerator plant was to be built on the specified parcel, lot 10-B, and the 52 acres of land under water abutting on that upland parcel. In the light of the facts and circumstances presented, the resolution authorizing the issuance of the bonds reasonably identifies the nature of the proposed project and its situs in the Hempstead Harbor area. Accordingly,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Queensbury Ass'n v. Town Board of the Town of QueensburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Robert v. Ford Motor Co.New York Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API