Legal Opinion
Rochester Community Savings Bank v. Smith
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 26, 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s cross motion seeking dismissal of the complaint. Defendant consented to submit to the personal jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York in the "individual guarantee agreement” which he executed on April 5, 1985 (see, National Equip. Rental v Szukhent, 375 US 311; Shepherd Showcase v Pekala, 138 AD2d 960). Contrary to defendant’s assertions, the guaranty *1019was not superseded or discharged by the guaranty that he executed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. SzukhentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kornfeld v. NRX Technologies, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Kornfeld v. NRX Technologies, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- European American Bank & Trust Co. v. SchirripaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Marine Midland Bank v. Idar Gem Distributors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- I.P.L. Corp. v. Industrial Power & Lighting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Cambridge Nutrition A.G. v. FotheringhamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- American Network Leasing Corp. v. ProzeralikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Creative Resources, Inc. v. RumbellowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- DASZ, INC. v. MERITOCRACY VENTURES, LTD.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013