Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Zahrndt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1897No. 17,949PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the LaPorte Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

Appellee brought this suit against appellants, Schmidt and wife, to foreclose a mortgage executed by them, making appellant, Tuthill, a party defendant.

Schmidt and wife were defaulted, and appellant, Tuthill, filed a general denial and a cross-complaint to foreclose a mortgage, which appellee answered by general denial.

The court tried the cause and made a special finding of facts and stated its conclusions of law thereon in favor of appellee. To the conclusions of law the appellant, Tuthill, excepted. Appellant Tuthill, filed a *449motion to modify the conclusions of law, also a motion for a new…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. . HunsickerNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Stuyvesant v. HallNew York Court of Chancery · 1847
  3. Campbell v. RouttIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Tapia v. DemartiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Witczinski v. EvermanMississippi Supreme Court · 1876

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. National State Bank v. Sandford Fork & Tool Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Fuller v. FullerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. In the Matter of Floyd Woodruff and Dolly Woodruff, Bankrupts. Charles H. Sparrenberger, Trustee, Etc. v. National City Bank of Evansville, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  4. Citizens State Bank v. JulianIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Dicus v. Ripley County Bank, Osgood, Indiana 47037Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API