Jeffrey Forbes, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. At&t Mobility Services LLC
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
Massachusetts law provides that employers may not subject any job applicant or employee to a lie detector test. See G.L. c. 149, § 19B(2). It also requires that all applications for employment in Massachusetts include written notice that it is unlawful to require or administer a lie detector test as a condition of employment. Id. § 19B(2)(b). This statute authorizes private enforcement actions, including on behalf of a plaintiff class. Id. § 19B(4). If a plaintiff bringing such a lawsuit were to obtain class certification and prevail on the merits, they could obtain statutory damages of $500…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Aspinall v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Boston Edison Co. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.