Legal Opinion

Jeffrey Forbes, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. At&t Mobility Services LLC

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided February 5, 2026No. 2584CV00611-BLS2Published

1Opinion of the Court

Massachusetts law provides that employers may not subject any job applicant or employee to a lie detector test. See G.L. c. 149, § 19B(2). It also requires that all applications for employment in Massachusetts include written notice that it is unlawful to require or administer a lie detector test as a condition of employment. Id. § 19B(2)(b). This statute authorizes private enforcement actions, including on behalf of a plaintiff class. Id. § 19B(4). If a plaintiff bringing such a lawsuit were to obtain class certification and prevail on the merits, they could obtain statutory damages of $500…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. Aspinall v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. Boston Edison Co. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API