Legal Opinion

Estate of Blake v. Benza

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 21, 1978No. 1 CA-CIV 3908PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WREN, Judge.

The primary issue raised in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in admitting into probate a letter as a holographic will. We find no error in the admission and, therefore, affirm the trial court.

The decedent, Harry J. Blake, was raised in Chicago by an aunt and married one of the aunt’s daughters, Edna. Edna’s sister, Gladys Kozla, her husband William, and their daughters, Judith Ann Sterbenz and Marilyn Tucker Hams (decedent’s nieces), are the appellants (contestants) in this action. The daughter of Blake’s deceased brother, LaVergne Benza (Benza), also a niece of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lane Title and Trust Company v. BrannanArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Estate of GolderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Richardson v. BeebeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Muccilli v. Huff's Boys' Store, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. Estate of Miller v. BeumlerArizona Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  2. Matter of Estate of MuderArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Matter of Estate of MuderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  4. Matter of Estate of OlschanskyColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Lind v. MuderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API