Legal Opinion
Lee v. McCardle (In re Peeples)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah
Decided July 14, 2016No. Bankruptcy Number: 14-23970; Adversary Proceeding No. 14-2159PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
R. KIMBALL MOSIER, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge
The central question in this declaratory judgment action is the scope of the automatic stay. This adversary proceeding *895does not affect Adam and Jennifer Peeples (Debtors), the chapter 7 trustee, or her administration of the bankruptcy estate. Other than the plaintiffs, Adrian J. Lee and Angela L.N. Lee, it does not affect any of the Debtors’ creditors. This is a fight between the Lees, or more correctly Adrian Lee (Lee), and a third party, Scott J. McCardle (McCardle). There is no basis for this Court to exercise jurisdiction under 28…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- John N. Fortier and Linda M. Fortier v. Dona Anna Plaza Partners, James A. Peterson, Peterson Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Diviney v. Nationsbank of Texas (In Re Diviney)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Johnson v. Smith (In Re Johnson)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. McCallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Seiko Epson Corporation and Epson America, Inc. v. Nu-Kote International, Inc. And Pelikan Produktions, A.G., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Castle Service, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2016
- Alpine Amusement Company, Inc. v. 741, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2025
- Paulson v. McKowenDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020