Legal Opinion
National American Insurance v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 23, 2007No. 2007-5016PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
The United States appeals a September 6, 2006, decision by the United States Court of Federal Claims granting summary judgment that the government violated its duty as stakeholder in a Miller Act payment bond case by making final payment to a government contractor after being notified by the payment bond surety, National American Insurance Company (“NAICO”), that it was asserting a right to contract funds after having fully discharged the debt of the contractor. Nat’l Am. Ins. Co. v. United States, 72 Fed.Cl. 451 (2006). Because the Court of Federal Claims correctly held…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Jan's Helicopter Service, Inc. v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Casitas Municipal Water District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Kelly Services, Inc. v. Creative Harbor, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.