Legal Opinion
Nichimen & Co. v. Framen Steel Supply Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 23, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph Brust, J.
Motion to dismiss the second and third counterclaims, as time-barred, is granted. These counterclaims are asserted in the amended answer, which was served pursuant to leave granted by this court. No counterclaims were asserted in the original answer. The counterclaims herein attacked are founded on charges of conversion, allegedly occurring in ,1961. The claim asserted in the amended complaint arises out' of a sale of goods in 1960 and is apparently unrelated to the claim or transaction upon which the counterclaims here at issue are based. A claim based upon a conversion is subject to a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hartmann v. Time, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Harriss v. TamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Heuer v. Basin Park Hotel and ResortDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shapiro v. SchoningerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Devine v. Rayette-Faberge, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
- Werner Spitz Construction Co. v. Vanderlinde Electric Corp., New York County Courts1970
- New York Telephone Co. v. County Ashphalt, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1976