Legal Opinion

Bagwell v. State

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 27, 2014No. Appellate Case No. 2010-173947; No. 5267Published

1Opinion of the CourtLockemy, J.

In this appeal from the denial of his post-conviction relief (PCR) application, Steve Bagwell argues the PCR court erred in finding his trial counsel was not ineffective for (1) failing to request DNA testing for blood found on glass recovered at the crime scene and (2) failing to argue a witness’s testimony was admissible to show evidence of a victim’s bias and motive to fabricate testimony. We reverse and grant Bagwell a new trial.

FACTS

This case involved an alleged burglary at an apartment complex in Greenville County. At trial, Jarrett Armstrong testified he and his roommate Chris Snoddy…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Ard v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  5. McKnight v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API