Legal Opinion

Jamaica Savings Bank v. Bryan

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1941PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHooley, J.

Motion to strike out the answer of defendants as insufficient in law. The action is brought to foreclose a mortgage. The defendants, in their answer, set forth that the defendant John W. Bryan has been since the 25th day of November, 1940, a soldier in the service of the United States Army, and assert that Muriel S. Bryan is the owner of the property, that the said John W. and Muriel S. Bryan are husband and wife, and that the defendant John W. Bryan is hable for the mortgage debt. The answer prays that the complaint be dismissed or that all proceedings be held in abeyance during the time of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dietz v. TreupelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Swiderski v. MoodenbaughDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1942
  3. Pope v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  4. Jamaica Savings Bank v. BryanNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Modern Industrial Bank v. GrossmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API