Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Killingsworth

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1951No. 5315PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Chief Justice.

This appeal, on the court’s own motion, should be dismissed for the appellant has wholly failed to comply with Rule X of this court as to his assignments of error.

Appellant makes four assignments of error as follows:

“I That the Court erred in admitting into evidence plaintiff’s Exhibits B, C, D, E, F, and G, (Rep.Trans. pages 22, 23; Abs. of Rec. pages 35-47).
“II That the Court erred in overruling the Appellant’s Motion for a Directed Verdict made upon the completion of all evidence in the case.
“III That the Verdict is not justified by and is contrary to law and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. of California v. ShieldsArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Meloy v. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Chester v. ChesterArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  4. City of Phoenix v. GreenArizona Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Graham's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Evans v. Valley Radiologists, Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Edwards v. GastonArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Graham v. MaxwellArizona Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API