Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Killingsworth
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1951No. 5315PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Chief Justice.
This appeal, on the court’s own motion, should be dismissed for the appellant has wholly failed to comply with Rule X of this court as to his assignments of error.
Appellant makes four assignments of error as follows:
“I That the Court erred in admitting into evidence plaintiff’s Exhibits B, C, D, E, F, and G, (Rep.Trans. pages 22, 23; Abs. of Rec. pages 35-47).
“II That the Court erred in overruling the Appellant’s Motion for a Directed Verdict made upon the completion of all evidence in the case.
“III That the Verdict is not justified by and is contrary to law and the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. ShieldsArizona Supreme Court · 1941
- Meloy v. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Chester v. ChesterArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- City of Phoenix v. GreenArizona Supreme Court · 1937
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Graham's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Evans v. Valley Radiologists, Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Edwards v. GastonArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Graham v. MaxwellArizona Supreme Court · 1951