Little Red River Levee District No. 2 v. Thomas
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart,. J.,
(after stating the facts). The general rule in this State is that equity will not grant relief iby in-' junction against the cutting of timber unless it is shown that an irreparable injury to the property will result, or that the destruction of the timber will render the freehold less susceptible of enjoyment, or that the acts of trespass are of a nature to constitute a nuisance, or that the defendant is insolvent. Meyers v. Hawkins, 67 Ark. 413, and Hall v. Wellman Lumber Company, 78 Ark. 408.
The decree of the chancellor was based upon his belief that the facts alleged in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brasch v. MumeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Myers v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
- Robertson v. McClintockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Hall v. Wellman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Tillman v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- McGehee v. Mid South Gas Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- Graysonia, Nashville & Ashdown Railroad v. Newberger Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Gunther & Shirley Co. v. Presbytery of Los AngelesArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- F. Burkart Mfg. Co. v. CaseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.