Legal Opinion

State v. Kirkham

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1958No. 8684PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRIOD, Justice.

Appeal from a murder conviction. Affirmed. Italics are ours.

The facts are not in dispute. While burglarizing a grocery store and having taken money therefrom, defendant required David Avon Frame and Ruth Holmes Webster to lie down on the floor, when he shot each in the back of the.head, killing both.

Defendant urges error in 1) the giving of an instruction relating to insanity and 2) in failing to instruct that the state had a mental institution for those suffering from mental illness.

As to 1) : The instruction given, so far as pertinent here, reads :

“Insanity is an element in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  2. State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State v. PikeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1870
  5. People v. . SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. SkinnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. HerreraUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. CrenshawCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. Darrell Devere Poulson v. John W. Turner, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  5. Comer Blocker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API