Legal Opinion

Vondersmith v. Kloidt

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1940No. Appeal, 2PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Argued November 12, 1940. This action of assumpsit was brought by H.M. Vondersmith, who is engaged in selling ice machines and conducting a machine shop, against Charles W. Kloidt, the operator of a brewery, to recover a balance claimed to be due on a running book account kept in the regular course of plaintiff's business. There was attached to plaintiff's statement of claim a copy of that account showing debits and credits over a period beginning April 19, 1933, and ending November 30, 1938. The cause came to trial with a jury, which found a verdict for the plaintiff for a sum less than the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New York & Penna. Co. v. N. Y. Central R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Nick v. CraigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Croushore's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Freeman v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Ross v. Penna. Underwriters Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gibson v. Stainless Steel Sales Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Gibson v. Stainless Steel Sales Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. O'Reilly v. Cellco Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Kemmerer v. Troxel, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1952
  5. Rex v. Wellspan Health, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API