McAllister v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice GRANT.
George Lawrence McAllister appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery. A jury found McAllister guilty, found an enhancement paragraph true, and assessed punishment of forty-five years’ confinement and a $5,000 fine. On appeal, McAllister contends he received ineffective assistance of counsel.
To prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, McAllister must show (1) that his attorney’s representation fell below a reasonable standard of effectiveness and (2) that the deficient performance was so serious that it prejudiced his defense. Strickland v.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ledezma v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Benson Dorsey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019
- Jurvis Cardel Carr v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2013
- Ledezma v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Rubio, Santiago v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.