Legal Opinion
Stotsenburg v. Marks
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1881No. 8488PublishedCited by 15 opinions
From the Washington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.
— Complaint upon a written instrument, which *194the circuit court held to be champertous and therefore void. The following is a copy of the instrument;
“ For value received I hereby give, bargain, sell, convey,, assign and set over to C. L. Dunham, all the estate I may be-entitled to have and receive of and from the estate of my de■ceased wife, Sarah Louden, deceased, formerly of Crindle, county Londonderry, Ireland, or by right of my having been the husband of said Sarah, whether the same consists iru lands, tenements, hereditaments, goods, wares, moneys, or choses in action, and I hereby…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Steeple v. DowningIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Sedgwick v. . StantonNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Coughlin v. . N.Y.C. and H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Scobey v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- German Mutual Insurance v. GrimIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Board of Commissioners v. JamesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Brown v. BignéOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Draper v. ZebecIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
- Allen v. FrazeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Casserleigh v. WoodColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.