Legal Opinion

Jim L. Shetakis Distributing Co. v. Centel Communications Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1988No. 18322PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Centel Communications Company (“Centel”) believed that it had formed a contract with Shetakis Wholesalers (“Shetakis”) binding Shetakis to purchase $52,552.00 worth of specialized communications equipment from Centel. When Centel attempted to bill Shetakis for the equipment, Shetakis refused to pay, claiming that no contract had been formed. The trial court decided that a valid contract had been formed and awarded Centel $13,893.44 in liquidated damages.

Jim Shetakis is the president of Shetakis Distributing Company, doing business as Shetakis Wholesalers, Inc. Sometime prior to the…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cochran v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Dolge v. MasekNevada Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Tropicana Hotel Corp. v. SpeerNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Widett v. Bond Estate, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Pacific Photocopy, Inc. v. Canon U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Flanagan v. Consolidated Nutrition, L.C.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2001
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2016
  3. The Lakeshore House Limited Partnership Vs. Bank Of The WestNevada Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API