Legal Opinion

State v. Roberts

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 3, 1967No. File No. CR 1-19515PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKinmonth, J.

The defendant was convicted of managing and maintaining a place where policy playing is carried on in violation of § 53-298 of the General Statutes and has appealed, assigning as error the court’s instruction to a state’s witness on self-incrimination, the admission of certain evidence, and the limiting and restricting of the cross-examination of the state’s witnesses. There is no finding and none was required. The defendant followed the procedure set forth in our rules. Practice Book §§ 957, 1006 (4).

In the first assignment of error, the defendant raises the adequacy of the court’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Casalo v. ClaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  3. State v. LuzziSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  4. State v. FosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. Marion C. Bowman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Surina v. BuckalewAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownKentucky Supreme Court · 1981
  4. City of Alexandria v. ThorneAlexandria County Circuit Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API