State v. McClure
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.
In this criminal case, defendant was convicted of resisting arrest for violating the terms of his parole. We conclude, as did the trial court and the Court of Appeals, that an arrest for a parole violation qualifies as an arrest for purposes of ORS 162.315 — the resisting arrest statute— and affirm.
Because the jury found defendant guilty, we present the facts in the light most favorable to the state. State v. Lewis, 352 Or 626, 628, 290 P3d 288 (2012). In 2009, defendant was walking in Portland’s Old Town when two officers stopped him, engaged him in conversation, and asked for his name.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. GarciaOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. WebbOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. KrognessOregon Supreme Court · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. LykinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Growing Green Panda v. Dept. of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. SarriaOregon Supreme Court · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.