Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Whisnant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1953PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On the testimony of plaintiffs’ own witnesses demonstrating the emergency unexpectedly created in the eastbound lane by the erratic operation of the DeSoto ear that came from the westbound lanes, cut across both eastbound lanes in a southerly direction, and then changed its course in a northwesterly direction into the path of eastbound traffic, plaintiffs failed to establish against defendant, Whisnant, driver of the Cadillac car going eastward, any actionable negligence proximately causing the accident and the injuries. Judgment insofar as appealed from by the defendant Whisnant, reversed…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nieves v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  2. Kutlina v. YiengstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  3. Andersen v. Bee Line, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Lo Piccolo v. Knight of Rest Products Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API