Legal Opinion

State v. St. Germaine

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 11, 1989No. 88-2042-CR, 88-2043-CR, 88-2044-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyse, J.

In this consolidated appeal, Wayne E. St. Germaine and Steven K. St. Germaine appeal their convictions for operating after revocation, third and fourth offenses, respectively, contrary to sec. 343.44(1), Stats. Fred LaBarge III, appeals his conviction for operating after revocation, second offense, 1 and operating while intoxicated and with a BAC over .10%, third offense, contrary to sec. 346.63(l)(a) and (b), Stats. The defendants argue that the state lacked subject matter jurisdiction to enforce these statutory provisions against them because they are enrolled members of the Lac du Flambeau…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Rice v. RehnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wis. v. State of Wis.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Steven K. St. Germaine v. Circuit Court for Vilas CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. State Ex Rel. Lykins v. SteinhorstCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  3. State v. BusseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Opinion No. Oag 23-89, (1989), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API