Legal Opinion

Chicago Title Insurance Company v. 100 Investment Limited Partnership

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 22, 2004No. 02-2474PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed in part and reversed in part by published opinion. Judge Niemeyer wrote the opinion, in which Judge Michael and Judge Gregory joined.

OPINION

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, we determine whether, under Maryland law, a title insurance company must indemnify its insured for (1) expenses incurred by the insured to resolve a defect in title to land when the expenses were incurred after the insured conveyed the land away; and (2) the cost of defending an action for trespass filed after the policy period, based on damage sustained during the policy period. The district court entered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Catalina Enterprises, Incorporated Pension Trust v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company, and Jennings Insurance Associates, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  2. Kendall v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  3. Ensor v. WEHLANDCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Gebhardt Family Investment, L.L.C. v. Nations Title Insurance of New York, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. 100 Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Columbia Town Center Title Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. Centennial Development Group, LLC v. Lawyer's Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  3. Hovannisian v. First Am. Title Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Back Creek Partners, LLC v. First American Title InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Best Process Solutions, Inc. v. Blue Phoenix Inashco USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API