Legal Opinion

Blanton v. Bruce

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided April 4, 1985No. 11-84-159-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLOUD, Chief Justice.

This is a declaratory judgment case. At issue is the ownership of a ¾ mineral interest in the Southwest lk of Section 124, HT & B Ry. Company Survey in Stephens County. The trial court found that the “Bruces” 1 own a V2 mineral interest in the land in question and the “Blantons” 2 own a ¼ mineral interest. The court held that the “Hudson Group” 3 owns no mineral interest in the Southwest lk of Section 124, HT & B Ry. Company Survey. The Hudson Group and the Blantons appeal. 4 We affirm.

Prior to April 24, 1914, R.H. Frost and wife, M.A.E. Frost, owned all of the surface…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Greene v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Smith Et Ux. v. SorelleTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. McMahon v. ChristmannTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  5. City of Beaumont v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gore Oil Co. v. Roosth, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2005
  2. Miller v. KloecknerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. MBank Abilene, N.A. v. Westwood Energy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1986
  4. Zapatero v. Canales, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1987
  5. Vivion v. Grelling, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API