Blanton v. Bruce
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
1Opinion of the Court
McCLOUD, Chief Justice.
This is a declaratory judgment case. At issue is the ownership of a ¾ mineral interest in the Southwest lk of Section 124, HT & B Ry. Company Survey in Stephens County. The trial court found that the “Bruces” 1 own a V2 mineral interest in the land in question and the “Blantons” 2 own a ¼ mineral interest. The court held that the “Hudson Group” 3 owns no mineral interest in the Southwest lk of Section 124, HT & B Ry. Company Survey. The Hudson Group and the Blantons appeal. 4 We affirm.
Prior to April 24, 1914, R.H. Frost and wife, M.A.E. Frost, owned all of the surface…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
- Greene v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Smith Et Ux. v. SorelleTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- McMahon v. ChristmannTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- City of Beaumont v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gore Oil Co. v. Roosth, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2005
- Miller v. KloecknerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- MBank Abilene, N.A. v. Westwood Energy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1986
- Zapatero v. Canales, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1987
- Vivion v. Grelling, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.