Commonwealth v. Mumma
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
489 Pa. 547 (1980)
414 A.2d 1026
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania
v.
Harold Paul MUMMA, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Submitted January 22, 1980.
Decided May 30, 1980.
Thomas G. Klingensmith, Lancaster, for appellant.
Richard A. Sheetz, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Lancaster, for appellee.
Before EAGEN, C.J., and O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, NIX, LARSEN and FLAHERTY, JJ.
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROBERTS, Justice.
This case presents a question of whether the Commonwealth introduced sufficient evidence at appellant's trial to satisfy the requirements of Pennsylvania's indecent assault statute, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3126.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KichlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. SparrowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. RoweSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. ChermanskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.