Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mumma

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 30, 1980No. 183Published

1Opinion of the Court

489 Pa. 547 (1980)

414 A.2d 1026

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania

v.

Harold Paul MUMMA, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted January 22, 1980.

Decided May 30, 1980.

Thomas G. Klingensmith, Lancaster, for appellant.

Richard A. Sheetz, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Lancaster, for appellee.

Before EAGEN, C.J., and O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, NIX, LARSEN and FLAHERTY, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

This case presents a question of whether the Commonwealth introduced sufficient evidence at appellant's trial to satisfy the requirements of Pennsylvania's indecent assault statute, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3126.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KichlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. SparrowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. RoweSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. ChermanskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API