Legal Opinion
United States v. Rudy Delgado, Jr. (01-2090) and Eduardo Flores (02-1009)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 5, 2003No. 01-2090, 02-1009PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge.
The primary issue presented in these criminal appeals is whether the district court’s method of jury selection — a method in which the parties were required to reduce a pool of 30 qualified jurors to a panel of 14 by using all of them peremptory challenges, with the court then designating two alternates by random draw immediately before the beginning of jury deliberations — violated, to the defendants’ prejudice, Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. We conclude that the random designation of alternates at the end of the trial was…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Robert Glen Coe, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ricky Bell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. Roger D. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Lawrence Edward Crayton, Jr., Also Known as Manny Harris and Alex WintersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. John T. Namey, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.