Legal Opinion

State v. Landgraf, Unpublished Decision (2-24-2006)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 2006No. C.A. No. 21141UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Ernest Landgraf, Jr., appeals from his conviction and sentence, following a no-contest plea, upon one count of Aggravated Robbery and one count of Failure to Comply with an Order of a Police Officer. Landgraf contends that the Aggravated Robbery indictment is defective because it fails to set forth a particular culpability state and also fails to specify the predicate Theft offense. He asserts that this defect in the indictment deprived the trial court of subject-matter jurisdiction. He also contends that the omission of this information from the indictment,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. BirdOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BeatyOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State v. Adams, 22493 (5-1-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. United States v. Tyren CervenakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  4. State v. Guy, 22444 (7-11-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. State v. McGinnisOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API