State v. Landgraf, Unpublished Decision (2-24-2006)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Ernest Landgraf, Jr., appeals from his conviction and sentence, following a no-contest plea, upon one count of Aggravated Robbery and one count of Failure to Comply with an Order of a Police Officer. Landgraf contends that the Aggravated Robbery indictment is defective because it fails to set forth a particular culpability state and also fails to specify the predicate Theft offense. He asserts that this defect in the indictment deprived the trial court of subject-matter jurisdiction. He also contends that the omission of this information from the indictment,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. BirdOhio Supreme Court · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BeatyOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. Adams, 22493 (5-1-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- United States v. Tyren CervenakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- State v. Guy, 22444 (7-11-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. McGinnisOhio Court of Appeals · 2022