Legal Opinion
State v. Farrah
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 30, 1971PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCotter, J.
The defendant was convicted on two counts, each charging the crime of obtaining money by false pretenses in violation of § 53-360 of the General Statutes. Error is assigned in the court’s conclusion that on all the evidence the defendant was guilty of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt and that the court erred “in concluding that the failure to do an act promised violated the provisions” of the statute under which he was charged. The intended meaning of the defendant’s claim of error under the second assignment requires some discussion but the ultimate issue is presented by his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Bradley v. OviattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- People v. MacECalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- People v. WiegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. RuizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- State v. HaddadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. SumnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. HolleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.