Legal Opinion

Steinberger v. Meyer

California Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1900No. Sac. No. 632PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Lassen County. E. A. Kelley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This litigation involves the respective rights of the parties to the use of the waters of a certain creek known as Willow Ranch creek. Plaintiff in his complaint alleged a diversion of these waters by defendants without right, and sought a permanent injunction, with damages. Defendants admitted a diversion of twenty-five inches of the waters of the creek, and claimed the right to so divert. They also> claimed rights as upper riparian owners, and rights by reason of an artificial increase of the flow of waters of certain springs which were situated upon their land, and which to some extent…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Montecito Valley Water Co. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Williams v. Blue Bird Laundry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. In Re Rights to Use of Waters of Silvies RiverOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Moramarco v. MoramarcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Hayes v. FlesherIdaho Supreme Court · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API