Legal Opinion

Darrell v. Hilligoss, Miller, Moscow & Rushville Gravel Road Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 9729PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Eush Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

— This was a suit by the appellee against the appellant to recover a balance claimed to be due on his subscription to the capital stock of the appellee. The cause was-put at issue and tried by the court, and a finding was made for appellee in the sum of $133.20, and over appellant's motion for a new trial and his exception saved, the court rendered judgment against him on its finding.

The first error of which appellant complains in this court is the overruling of his demurrer to appellee's complaint. The only objections to the complaint, pointed out in argument by appellant's counsel, are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Child v. SwainIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Town of Martinsville v. ShirleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Durham v. FechheimerIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Burns v. FoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Levy v. ChittendenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Folsom v. ButtolphIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Ratliff v. StretchIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Whitcomb v. StringerIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API