State v. Haas
North Dakota Supreme Court
RROR, to district court, Cass county; McConnell, Judge. Hon. William B. John Haas was convicted for an illegal sale of intoxicating liquors, and brings error, claiming the statute prohibiting the sale in certain cases to be unconstitutional. The facts and authorities cited by counsel are fully set forth in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Corliss, C. J.
The plaintiff in error, having been convicted under the provisions ©f chapter 110 of the Laws of 1890 of the offense of keeping and maintaining a place for the sale of intoxicating liquors, and in which such liquors were sold, in violation of law, now and here insists that the judgment of conviction is void because of the unconstitutionality of this act. No other question is raised. The portion of the state constitution alleged to be violated by this law is § 61 of article 2, which provides that “no bill shall embrace more than one…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. Judge of the Circuit CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888
- Hronek v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Fahey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
- State ex rel. Nash v. MadsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Ramagnano v. CrookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Martin v. TylerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Erickson v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- State ex rel. Kol v. North Dakota Children's Home SocietyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
- State ex rel. Standish v. NomlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
- State ex rel. Larabee v. BarnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.