Shaw Acquisition Co. v. Bank of Elk River
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s order granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment. Appellant argues that the district court erred in concluding that appellant’s foreclosure sale produced a surplus after appellant’s first-priority mortgage was satisfied. Appellant claims that its split-priority junior mortgage must be satisfied also before respondent’s second-position mechanic’s lien gets paid. We affirm.
FACTS
On March 5,1998, appellant Bank of Elk River acquired two mortgages, $105,000 each, and two notes from Allied Mortgage on two properties (North and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Dynamic Air, Inc. v. BlochCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Erickson v. IrelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Axel Newman Heating & Plumbing Co. v. SauersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Model Home Building, Inc. v. TurnquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shaw Acquisition Co. v. Bank of Elk RiverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- First Minnesota Bank v. Overby Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010