City of Grand Rapids v. Assfy
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Respondents appeal a jury award of $30,500 in their favor.
This is a condemnation case. Respondents appeal and ask for a new trial, predicating such request on three alleged errors committed by the trial court.
Respondents first question the trial court’s failure to repress petitioner’s counsel’s representation in final argument of a fact not in evidence. In Michigan, when such error appears, opposing counsel must take two steps. First, he must object, and then, after obtaining a ruling, must request a curative instruction. Marr v Saginaw County Agricultural Society, 364 Mich 373, 377 (1961).…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Urban Renewal, Elmwood Park ProjectMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Anderson v. LippesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Marr v. Saginaw County Agricultural SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kovacs v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Burke v. Angies, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Detroit/Wayne County Stadium Authority v. Drinkwater, Taylor & Merrill, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Treece v. Greyhound Bus Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- State Highway Commission v. WestermanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974