Legal Opinion

City of Grand Rapids v. Assfy

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1973No. Docket 13745PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondents appeal a jury award of $30,500 in their favor.

This is a condemnation case. Respondents appeal and ask for a new trial, predicating such request on three alleged errors committed by the trial court.

Respondents first question the trial court’s failure to repress petitioner’s counsel’s representation in final argument of a fact not in evidence. In Michigan, when such error appears, opposing counsel must take two steps. First, he must object, and then, after obtaining a ruling, must request a curative instruction. Marr v Saginaw County Agricultural Society, 364 Mich 373, 377 (1961).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Urban Renewal, Elmwood Park ProjectMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Anderson v. LippesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Marr v. Saginaw County Agricultural SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kovacs v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Burke v. Angies, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Detroit/Wayne County Stadium Authority v. Drinkwater, Taylor & Merrill, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Treece v. Greyhound Bus Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. State Highway Commission v. WestermanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API