Legal Opinion

Cheteni v. Vella

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 26, 2025No. 3:23-cv-06286Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FREEDOM CHETENI, Case No. 23-cv-06286-SI 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 10 MALIA VELLA, et al., PLEADINGS 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 71 12 13 14 Plaintiff Freedom Cheteni filed a first amended complaint against defendants Malia Vella 15 and Carrie Lopes asserting six causes of action. Dkt. No. 16. Defendants have moved for judgment 16 on the pleadings under Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkt. No. 71. Pursuant 17 to Civil Local…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API