Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Stebbins

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 10, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

There were two counts in the declaration. The first, a count upon an account annexed, wherein the claim was for reimbursement for the plaintiff’s services and expenses in connection with the acquisition by the defendant, through bond buying and under decree of foreclosure of the bond mortgage, of the title to the real estate of the Cherryfield Lumber Company, to the defendant’s profit. In practice the count upon the account annexed is substituted for the money counts. Levee v. Mardin, 126 Maine, 133. Next came an omnibus count, with averment that this and the other were for the same cause of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Daley v. People's Building, Loan & Saving Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. Hood v. HartshornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. Stitzel v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Bacon v. SchepflinIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hurt v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  2. Loyal Erectors, Inc. v. Hamilton & Son, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  3. Triple-A Baseball Club Associates v. Northeastern Baseball, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1987
  4. Winegar v. EarleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  5. Drew Brown Limited v. Joseph Rugo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API