Legal Opinion
Rome Urban Renewal Agency v. Rome Television Center, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 2, 1976PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: In this condemnation action, the Rome Urban Renewal Agency (RURA) appeals from an order confirming the report of the condemnation commissioners. Defendant’s rectangular parcel of land had a frontage of 43.5 feet on the north side of West Dominick Street in the City of Rome and the same frontage on the south side of West Willett Street. Its depth was approximately 200 feet. In 1954 the southern half of the parcel was improved by the construction of a two-story brick building with a full basement. A 7-by 10-foot addition extended from the rear…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of City of New York (Juniper Ave.)New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- In re HuieNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Chiesa v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Brand v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1965
- Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency v. HarkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Conti v. R.I. Economic Development Corp., 96-4435 (2003)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2003