Legal Opinion

Radatz v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2016No. 2014-1126PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

{¶ 1} In this appeal, we address whether a cease-and-desist order issued by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) to defendant-appellant, Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), divested the trial court of subject-matter jurisdiction over the class action of plaintiff-appellee, Rebekah R. Radatz, for statutory damages against Fannie Mae under R.C. 5301.36(C). We agree with the holding of the Eighth District Court of Appeals that the cease- and-desist order did not preclude the trial court from exercising jurisdiction under 12 U.S.C. 4635(b), the federal statute governing…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. MCorp Financial, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Genty v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  5. Denis J. Murphy, Trustee v. Household Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hicks v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Voss v. Quicken Loans, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. Hicks v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Voss v. Quicken Loans LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API