Radatz v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.
{¶ 1} In this appeal, we address whether a cease-and-desist order issued by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) to defendant-appellant, Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), divested the trial court of subject-matter jurisdiction over the class action of plaintiff-appellee, Rebekah R. Radatz, for statutory damages against Fannie Mae under R.C. 5301.36(C). We agree with the holding of the Eighth District Court of Appeals that the cease- and-desist order did not preclude the trial court from exercising jurisdiction under 12 U.S.C. 4635(b), the federal statute governing…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. MCorp Financial, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Genty v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Denis J. Murphy, Trustee v. Household Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hicks v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Voss v. Quicken Loans, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Hicks v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Voss v. Quicken Loans LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021