Legal Opinion

State v. Hudson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 19, 1903PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Indictment for murder against John Hudson, Henry Hudson, Money Hudson, Jack Centell, Thomas Hudson and George Hudson. The three first were convicted of manslaughter and appeal. cite: As to lazv of circumstantial evidence: 35 S. C., 16; 49 S. C., 285. As to complicity in crime: 36 S. C., 524; 6 Ency., 2 ed., 871; 109 Ala., 11; 49 S. C., 550.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

John Hudson, Money Hudson, George Hudson, Thomas Hudson and Jack Centell, were all charged in one indictment with the murder of Rachel Thomas, and were tried at the March term of Court of General Sessions for the county of Oconee. George Hudson and Thomas Hudson were acquitted, and the other defendants were convicted of manslaughter and sentenced. The defendants who were convicted have appealed to this Court. The exceptions make the point that the trial Judge erred in his charge in two respects: First, in charging the rule as to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. AughtrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  2. State v. CarsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. HesterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. State v. KimbrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  3. State v. DornbergSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  4. State v. HurtSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  5. State v. BakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API