Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Wiley

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided February 10, 2004No. ACTION 2:02CV652PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND FINAL ORDER

FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a Virginia inmate, brings this pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, to redress alleged violations of his constitutional rights. Specifically, plaintiff claims that he was denied adequate medical care, access to prison law libraries, and religious materials, and was subjected to an abusive strip search and unconstitutional prison conditions. Plaintiff also contends that his incoming and outgoing mail was unreasonably restricted and that he was unreasonably fired from his job as a law clerk. Plaintiff seeks injunctive and…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Key v. RobertsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
  2. Campbell v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
  3. Alston v. RobinsonDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2022
  4. Harrison v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon ServicesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024
  5. Johnson v. United States Of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API