Legal Opinion
Charles McKenzie v. City of White Hall
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 23, 1997No. 96-2886EAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
FAGG, Circuit Judge.
After several years of zoning struggles, Charles, Ronald, and Mark McKenzie, owners and developers of a residential subdivision in the City of White Hall, Arkansas, brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City, its Planning Commission, and the Planning Commissioner (collectively the City), alleging the City violated the McKenzies’ Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The City moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim under § 1983, but the district court denied the motion. The case proceeded to trial, and near the end, the district…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McKENZIE v. CITY OF WHITE HALLCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997