Legal Opinion

State v. Barnhouse

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 23, 1986No. 16285PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

Wesley Barnhouse conditionally pled guilty and was convicted in Idaho of grand theft. On appeal, he contends the district court erred in denying his pretrial motion to dismiss and in refusing to grant relief on his petition for habeas corpus. In his motion and petition, Barnhouse asserted that he had been arrested and brought before the court in violation of a due process right to resist extradition. As a result, he requested the court to decline jurisdiction over the Idaho charge and to order Barn-house removed to Montana where he could resist extradition to Idaho. We…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Frisbie v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Ker v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. United States v. Francisco ToscaninoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. Biddinger v. Commissioner of Police of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Mahon v. JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BarrosIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. BarrosIdaho Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API