Legal Opinion
State v. Barros
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided April 1, 1998No. 23349Published
1Opinion of the Court
957 P.2d 1095 (1998)
131 Idaho 379
STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Michael A. BARROS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 23349.
Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, January 1998 Term.
April 1, 1998.
Knowlton, Miles & Merica, Lewiston, for appellant. Charles E. Kovis argued.
Hon. Alan G. Lance, Attorney General; Catherine O. Derden, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Catherine O. Derden argued.
TROUT, Chief Justice.
This appeal arises from the magistrate court's denial of the defendant's motion to dismiss and/or suppress. The defendant argues that state law enforcement officials lack the authority…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Frisbie v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. Valdez-MolinaIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
- Rice v. RehnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.