Legal Opinion

Marshall Field & Co. v. Freed

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 11, 1915No. Gen. No. 20,190PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Clabence N. Goodwin, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1914.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff, Marshall Field & Company, recovered a judgment in the Superior Court against the defendant, Isidor B. Freed, in an action on the case for fráud and deceit. Due service of process was had on the defendant and he entered his appear aneé, but filed no plea. A default was thereupon entered for want of a plea, and the damages were assessed by a jury. A writ of fieri facias was issued and placed in the hands of the sheriff. In due course, the sheriff returned this writ “no property found and no part satisfied,” certifying…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kuehner v. City of FreeportIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Lambert v. WiltshireIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Sulzberger v. GoldsteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
  4. Wiltshire v. LambertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brewer v. BrewerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  2. Gilman v. JoseloffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  3. State v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  4. Baehr v. DeckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Brewer v. BrewerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API