Legal Opinion

Van Valkenburg v. T.E.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 2008No. 20080034PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] T.E. appeals a district order granting involuntary treatment with prescribed medication at the North Dakota State Hospital. Because the district court did not make a necessary finding in its order, we reverse.

I

[¶ 2] In April 2007, T.E. was admitted to the State Hospital after becoming disruptive while incarcerated at the Cass County Jail. The physician who admitted T.E. to the State Hospital diagnosed T.E. with elective mutism and psychotic disorder not otherwise specified. T.E. has been admitted to the State Hospital on seven prior occasions, beginning in 1981, and had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ElkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In Interest of RNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Feland v. P.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. North Dakota State Hospital v. D.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MeadorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. North Dakota State Hospital v. C.A.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. In Re TENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In Re CahNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API